Time and Gravity
Our concept of gravity is built in—it’s like a solidified version of our idea of continuous moments (movement?). It’s no more complicated than that.
In our conception of the universe, gravity must exist, but outside of time as we know it, gravity is unnecessary. Movement would make no difference in that case. Thus, time is not only tied to space and motion, but also to gravity.
Gravity appears to us more as an active principle inherent to every object on Earth than as a reaction to an external force (i.e., Earth itself).
It could be described as a physical or biological attribute. It is like an ether or an aura, strongest near the object and weakening as the distance increases.
Gravity is not even approximately as constant as it is usually assumed to be.
There are places in the universe where gravity is weaker, and others where it is stronger than it should be.
When gravity is more fully understood, it will become apparent that the "law of gravity" must be modified. It will become clear that the universe, in terms of gravity, is not in equilibrium.
(Rob: Seth once said that the universe expands like ideas.)
Applied to a rotating flywheel, time behaves differently at the outer edge than at the center.
Gravity is like an atmosphere around an object, when time is considered in a certain way, and it also involves motion. If one were to observe the flywheel with specific instruments, one could determine that the flow of time actually changes.
The common idea is that gravity exists as a physical force between objects and space, but gravity also exists as a pull related to time and connected to these objects.
Gravity, time, and mass are all closely linked. Studies of gravity cannot be developed without considering Einstein's concepts of time.
There are holes in the universe—not necessarily black or white—where mass does not exert the expected gravitational force. Wherever that occurs, there will be a distortion of time.
It may be that the time differential occurring in a flywheel between the center and the edge cannot be detected while inside our system. However, if someone conducted this experiment in a spaceship (traveling near the speed of light), then even after accounting for relativistic effects as currently understood, a difference would still remain.
There is another equation, still waiting to be discovered, that expresses the relationship between time, mass, and gravity. Einstein examined such relationships in the distant universe, in the context of increasing velocity approaching the speed of light. But there are also "internal" situations that connect to these magnitudes and are much easier to approach. Gravity is related to time through a specific type of rotation, a particular ratio.
Gravity has a particular effect on matter. Time exerts an invisible pull on matter, which is interpreted as gravity. Time exerts a specific force, just like gravity, and this is connected to the behavior of electrons.
However, as long as we view electrons one way and gravity another, the connection will elude us.
There is another kind of gravity that surrounds older objects differently from younger ones, and we do not perceive this difference with our instruments. We could perceive this difference, however, if we knew what to look for. Age affects gravity. With current instruments, these differences are too small to detect, but at lower levels with different instruments, these changes could be observed. Older objects are heavier. This refers to normal gravity—not a new kind of gravity.
Our concepts of time create an artificial grid. When we observe an electron, we observe it through our grid and think we are tracking its trace. In reality, all we see is a trace of the electron. For this reason, the positions in which we believe the electron to be located mostly correlate with the artificial grid we’ve imposed over the whole.
The "spin" of the electron, as mentioned above, is associated with forward-time or forward-motion. The reverse spin of the electron is also associated with forward-time, but in a different direction. The forward spin of the electron is involved in the formation of atoms and molecules. The reverse spin, which holds the same ratio as the forward spin, is associated with a different movement in time (not a reverse movement), though from our perspective it may appear reversed.
We say that we are looking backward in time when we look out into space. There is a connection between this perspective and the view of an electron. We do not actually see backward in time—it only appears that way from our standpoint. It is equally valid to say that we are looking forward in time.
In other words, the reverse spin corresponds to a different kind of forward-time. This is also true for our view of the universe through a telescope. The whole matter is tied to what gravity is for us.
Our notions of the expansion of the universe are connected to the concepts of gravity and time. As an analogy, one could say that sound expands with increasing volume, even though it requires no more space. This accurately describes how the universe expands, and yet the expansion is clear and real.
The same mistake we make in considering the electron is repeated when we observe the universe through telescopes. A certain kind of pulsation in the electron—perhaps five of them—together form what we call the "Now," which is the point at which the structure (of the electron) presents itself as perfectly as possible in our world.
In terms of gravity, this point corresponds to a kind of optimal formation, such that it can move freely under any potential conditions—and that it is stable. However, this is only one mode of the electron's manifestation in relation to its entry into our system. In fact, there exists equally a pull, an influence in terms of gravity. Just as gravity builds up invisibly in our universe, it is likewise built up in this other form, connected to the reverse spin of the electron, and just as invisible to us.
There is a continuous interaction between the regular and reverse spin of the electron. If anything were to happen to the electron that affected either the regular or the reverse spin, an instability would become visible—either in time or gravity, but usually in the form of gravity. Any anomaly we encounter in the universe related to gravity represents an invisible change in time.
A chamber that we could construct to give the electron more freedom would need to account for changes in mass or time.
The cell structure of a cancer cell differs in terms of gravity from a normal cell, but the differences may be so small that we cannot detect them.
Improved experiments with electrons would be a good way to help us understand time better.
If we could build an electron smasher, just as we’ve built atom smashers, it would scatter an electron in all directions of its orbital units. Somehow, the minus sign in our equations should be regarded as an integral part of the plus sign. The minus is not subordinate to the plus, but it cannot exist without the plus. Whenever a plus appears in an equation, a minus is hidden within it. That is somehow very important.
Gravity, like the electron, has an outer and a hidden aspect. The equations that describe gravity only address its outer aspect. The form of these equations prevents us from seeing gravity as it truly is. Gravity contains further deviations in terms of time than we have been able to perceive so far. This has to do with the electron and with the structure of our cells.
When we look through our telescopes, we are looking into a reversed time—though this has nothing to do with past time. In other words, gravity behaved differently in the past than it does today. Somehow, matter had less weight than it does today, in such a way that all conclusions we draw based on our current understanding of gravity are flawed because of the lesser weight it had then.
It follows that expansion did not occur in the way we imagine. Similarly, matter will be heavier in the future. And, to take it even further, gravity is not as constant as we expect it to be. There are regions of the universe where it acts more heavily or more lightly than we would expect.
Just as the electron has the property of reverse spin, so too does the universe as a whole. But we would have to place ourselves outside the universe to perceive that. Effects may occur within the universe—possibly psychic ones—that could be observed, but non-psychological proof may be impossible.
Comments
Post a Comment